Education

Voices for Change: A Critical Analysis of Get Inclusive’s Sexual Violence Prevention

Voices for Change: A Critical Analysis of Get Inclusive’s Sexual Violence Prevention

As a college student, I know conversations around critical issues like sexual assault, drinking and drug use, discrimination and institutional inequality happen in various settings. Some of these happen organically among students, and others are prompted through university led workshops and online trainings. Unfortunately, one important topic that doesn’t get enough discussion is bystander intervention as a method to address critical issues like sexual assault and discrimination.

Review: Voices for Change

Bystander intervention is a core theme in Get Inclusive’s new sexual violence prevention training program, Voices for Change. I recently had the opportunity to review Voices for Change to better understand its unique approach to prevention education.

Voices for Change focuses on four main topics: Identities and Inclusion, Consent and Sexual Violence (Title IX and Campus SaVE), Alcohol and Other Drugs and Hazing and Intimidation. What I appreciated off the bat was the tenets of identities and inclusion were presented at the beginning and in a straightforward manner. Because our social identities (real or perceived) can affect how we respond as a bystander to events later discussed in the program, starting with discussions on identity is smart, as students can apply those thoughts to the other three main topics as they go through Voices for Change.

In the program’s videos, four different narrators who seem to be in their 20’s lead the discussions and information given about these topics and how bystander intervention can play a positive role in problematic events. The aspect of having peer narrators is important; college students are going to listen better to people that are similar to them. And their dialogue hits the nail on the head — the narrators don’t sound overly scripted. As they relay important information and concepts to the viewer, they’re also real about it. The narrators speak to each other and talk about the nuances of an issue in a believable way. One woman confesses that she said something racist in the past, but realized later that her statement was harmful. There’s a sweet spot between a straight-laced lecture and overly conversational dialogue that almost satirizes how young people converse, and Get Inclusive’s narrators fit in that sweet spot.

The examples of real-life, impactful events related to each topic are good and well-constructed. The dialogue from the bystanders in each incident sounds real and captures what someone’s thought process might look like as they witness microaggressions, hazing or gradual alcohol abuse. They have doubts. They have reservations. They realize the nuances of a situation without ever denying that something harmful was happening. This is how real students think and feel and reflect; these vignettes, I believe, are effective at engaging the viewer in a story that sounds true-to-life.

Beyond Listening

Voices for Change’s education on these topics goes beyond listening to definitions and conversations. The program also supplies statistics about sexual assault, hazing and drug abuse. The information provided is not framed in a scare-tactic manner, but it does reveal the hard facts about these sensitive topics. For example, in the consent and sexual violence portion of the program, the participant is met with the shocking commonality of sexual violence: 1 in 5 college women will be assaulted, as will 1 in 4 trans/gender non-binary folks and 1 in 13 men. It also lists the statistics of how often sexual violence is reported and what keeps survivors from seeking help and justice.

Combining the approaches of statistical information and nuanced, real dialogue presents students with a compound consideration of each topic. If they’re doubtful about the alcohol abuse vignette, for example, perhaps the information about how binge drinking and alcohol abuse is defined will give them the perspective they need to understand the problem.

Voices for Change doesn’t beat around the bush, and from a college student’s perspective, I appreciate that. We don’t need analogies to talk about these topics; these issues affect our lives and bodies, so we need to talk about how they can affect our lives and bodies. This program understands that its audience frankly wants mature, informed discussion of these topics. Dialogue catered to an emerging adult audience that does not talk down to them is, honestly, hard to find. Voices for Change recognizes the reality that college students are adults, just less experienced and aware generally than college graduates.

Self-Reflection

Lastly, the portions of Voices for Change that ask for the participant to interact with questions and trivia are centered around reflection. The most common interactive activity is a form of journaling — the program asks the participant to type their responses to questions in a text field. This ties into an overarching theme of the program: imagination. Imagining potential scenarios and reflecting on the information given can be an important learning tool, and it is at least more memorable than clicking on bubbles to answer a multiple choice quiz. Voices for Change prioritizes individual responses and reflections, something that reflects pedagogy that students will run into in at least one class, if not multiple times over their college career.

By providing relatable narrators, realistic dialogue, pertinent facts and reflection-based learning methods, the creators behind Voices for Change have grasped what works for college students. Nuanced conversations and the frank and mature presentation of problematic topics mirror what kinds of dialogues students will have in real life with friends, resident assistants, club members, teammates and professors.

The Facts

institution
EMPLOYEE AND FACULTY POPULATION (FTE)
get inclusive products
process
Role IN Evaluation
previous vendor
Why they left

Q&A

WANT TO LEARN MORE ABOUT AOD STUDENT WELLNESS TRAINING?